cx of 1ac
literally worst ever - there was one question
1NC Hari
good diversity of args on heg - also good job of separating htem as "packages"
its a little weird to read prolif = extinction and THEN the link
you had 40 seconds left! you probably need some more defense on terrorism
2AC Tatsuro
start slow
slower on t
no subpoint
extend your terminalimpact to the stability adv
make sure you extend by arg and not cite - this is usper important when its hard to flow tons of case stuff
need Offense on prolif - also draw distinction btn the vertical and horizatonal prolif
you need some none heg add-on to drop in that debate as well
use all of your time!!!
if you read the email layne stuff, you gotta say its an email in the cite
2nc Jonathan
the block division!?!?!
your 2nc on heg is hard to flow bc you don't reference the 1nc well. you need to treat it as if each package of 1nc args is a component/separate piece of paper
no cards in 2nc on heg?!?!?
1nr hari
your 1nr on heg only references 2ac numbers, group off of 1nc args andjust answer through embededd clash. its harder to follow you
also, no cards again?!? your explanations are ok, but you need more detailed specifics
the t double turn is intriguing, but not worth this much time investment. you're unlikely to win on it so why spend such a chunk of the 1nr - and this was GOING to be 5 minutes?!?!?
1ar
too much prep time - QUIT BICKERING
I think your heg stuff was too much 2ac extension. when they don't read any cards at all on this big of a debate, try resolving issues. I think it is also sufficient to say "they didn't answer our 4 reasons heg is sustainable" and not reexplain them in the 1ar.
2nr
redo this by going for the case debate. this t double turn = two thumbs down
HOWEVER, if you're going for it, why go for the intervention turn? you have to answer all of the other complicating arguments, too.
I'm perplexed why y'all would pick a strat that doesn't suit well to your speed and that apparently you have a ton of interest in. Why not pick some other off case arguments or CP out of heg?
2ar
don't reexplaina ll of your heg args. just say " sustainability takes out intervention" and explain why.
no need to go so quickly - this is a small 2ar
spend more time explaining your way out of the T double bind - less on the heg advantage.
cx of 1ac
literally worst ever - there was one question
1NC Hari
good diversity of args on heg - also good job of separating htem as "packages"
its a little weird to read prolif = extinction and THEN the link
you had 40 seconds left! you probably need some more defense on terrorism
2AC Tatsuro
start slow
slower on t
no subpoint
extend your terminalimpact to the stability adv
make sure you extend by arg and not cite - this is usper important when its hard to flow tons of case stuff
need Offense on prolif - also draw distinction btn the vertical and horizatonal prolif
you need some none heg add-on to drop in that debate as well
use all of your time!!!
if you read the email layne stuff, you gotta say its an email in the cite
2nc Jonathan
the block division!?!?!
your 2nc on heg is hard to flow bc you don't reference the 1nc well. you need to treat it as if each package of 1nc args is a component/separate piece of paper
no cards in 2nc on heg?!?!?
1nr hari
your 1nr on heg only references 2ac numbers, group off of 1nc args andjust answer through embededd clash. its harder to follow you
also, no cards again?!? your explanations are ok, but you need more detailed specifics
the t double turn is intriguing, but not worth this much time investment. you're unlikely to win on it so why spend such a chunk of the 1nr - and this was GOING to be 5 minutes?!?!?
1ar
too much prep time - QUIT BICKERING
I think your heg stuff was too much 2ac extension. when they don't read any cards at all on this big of a debate, try resolving issues. I think it is also sufficient to say "they didn't answer our 4 reasons heg is sustainable" and not reexplain them in the 1ar.
2nr
redo this by going for the case debate. this t double turn = two thumbs down
HOWEVER, if you're going for it, why go for the intervention turn? you have to answer all of the other complicating arguments, too.
I'm perplexed why y'all would pick a strat that doesn't suit well to your speed and that apparently you have a ton of interest in. Why not pick some other off case arguments or CP out of heg?
2ar
don't reexplaina ll of your heg args. just say " sustainability takes out intervention" and explain why.
no need to go so quickly - this is a small 2ar
spend more time explaining your way out of the T double bind - less on the heg advantage.